CivilRisk IQ — Put risk in its place
Menu

For public agencies · planning through construction

Know what's missing
before you approve it.

CivilRisk IQ reviews consultant plans, technical reports, CEQA/NEPA documents and local capital projects for public agencies. 21 AI specialists prepare sheet-referenced findings; your engineer or authorized decision-maker decides. Put taxpayer resources to work wisely.

See a real finding

Caltrans districts, cities, counties and transportation commissions · Typical review in 5–10 business days

Clarify the decisionWhat needs attention before the next milestone?
Explain the basisWhat does the evidence support, and what is still open?
Support stewardshipWhat should be resolved before committing funds?

By the numbers One real review: I-215 / Keller Interchange, 95% PS&E plans

281plan-set pages reviewed in one I-215 / Keller Interchange 95% PS&E run
1,212 → 474raw candidates narrowed to retained findings by manager and Red Team review
21AI specialists: 12 plan-set disciplines and 9 environmental resource areas
5–10business days for a typical review, depending on package size and scope

What we review for agencies

Every submittal your staff has to sign off on.

State highway projects or local capital improvements: when a consultant hands your agency a package, CivilRisk IQ can review it before you accept it.

Consultant plans & PS&E

Any milestone from 30% to 100%, on or off the State Highway System: roadway, drainage, structures, traffic, utilities and staging.

CEQA/NEPA documents & technical studies

EIRs, EISs, EAs and IS/MNDs and every study inside them, screen-checked before circulation. Your decision-maker decides.

Design technical reports

Geotechnical, soils and materials, foundation, structures, hydrology and drainage, traffic and utility reports behind the plans.

Caltrans deliverables

PSRs, project reports, PA&ED and PS&E packages, design standard decision documents and storm water data reports.

Local capital improvement projects

Pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter, sidewalks and ADA ramps, storm drains and signals for cities and counties.

Specs, estimates & schedules

Special provisions, quantities, engineer's estimates and construction schedules, checked against the plans before you advertise.

Don't see your document?

A real finding, step by step

Trace the source. Show the open question. Assign the next check.

How to read our examples: these are real candidates from CRIQ reviews of actual plan sets. Each shows its status; a candidate is a question for the design engineer, not a verified defect or a statement about current field conditions.

I-215 / Keller Interchange · Bioswale 45 drainage profileStatus: engineer verification

Three flow-line elevations define the question.

D-3 / Upstream

I 308+07.99

FL 1568.55 ft

Bioswale 45 beginning
D-5 / Low point

I 311+90.3

FL 1566.96 ft

Intermediate grade
D-5 / End

I 313+00.85

FL 1567.73 ft

End grade

The last roughly 110 feet rises 0.77 feet.

D-5 annotations

I 311+90.3: FL 1566.96

I 313+00.85: FL 1567.73

End elevation is 0.77 ft above the intermediate low point.

Hydraulics & drainage specialist

Where does flow leave the low point?

No collection point was identified in the compared sheets. A rising grade alone does not establish a drainage defect.

Source-plan and drainage-design check needed

Verify the annotations and the intended outlet.

Evidence to check

D-3 and D-5 profile labels

Confirm stationing, flow-line elevations and the plotted grade on the source sheets and adjacent drainage details.

Still open

Low-point drainage path

Is there an inlet, underdrain, cross-sheet connection or intentional reverse flow?

Engineer decides whether the concern holds

One record, carried into every management view.

Findings-register entry

I-215 / Keller · Bioswale 45 · D-3 and D-5

Record
FL 1566.96 at I 311+90.3; FL 1567.73 at I 313+00.85.
Status
Pending engineer verification against the source plans.
Next action
Ask the consultant to confirm the low-point collection feature or intended flow path and document the answer on the plans.
A measured plan question. A traceable design response.
I-215 / Keller Interchange sheet D-3 excerpt: Bioswale 45 shaded blue with its beginning flow-line callout highlighted yellow and review clouds
Sheet D-3 · BeginningFL 1568.55 ft at I 308+07.99 · Open full size ↗
I-215 / Keller Interchange sheet D-5 excerpt: Bioswale 45 shaded blue around the dashed flow line, two flow-line callouts highlighted yellow and review clouds
Sheet D-5 · Low point and endFL 1566.96 ft to 1567.73 ft · Open full size ↗

Read the full case studies →

From the engineering desk to the council agenda

One review record. A report for every audience.

Tap a cover to see it full size. Formats are agreed during scoping.

Engineering & technical teamsThe Technical Findings Report: every finding with sheet, page and evidence, so staff can check it quickly.
Project & department leadersThe Executive / Management Report: the decisions with the greatest effect on scope, schedule and public funds.
Councils, boards & executivesA briefing that explains the basis for a funding request, what remains uncertain and who owns the next step.
Ongoing oversightThe Monthly Risk Dashboard: open questions and their movement between milestones.

Compare all 12 report formats →

Getting started

A guided start. One manageable step at a time.

  1. 01

    Talk with Jason

    Use the complimentary 20-minute call to discuss the project, your questions and whether a scoped review fits.

  2. 02

    Define the engagement

    Agree on the records, deliverables and date, then set it up by purchase order or on-call task order.

  3. 03

    Share with guidance

    Upload through a project-scoped portal with authorized access; we help your IT and procurement teams with security documentation.

  4. 04

    Review the next decision

    Receive the findings in 5–10 business days, discuss open questions and set the follow-up with your consultant.

Security & onboarding for agencies →

Questions agencies ask

Frequently asked questions

Does this replace our plan checkers?

No. CivilRisk IQ gives your reviewers a sheet-referenced head start on every submittal. Your staff keep their judgment and authority; the specialists make sure nothing in a large package goes unread.

Can you review our consultant’s submittal before we approve it?

Yes. That is the most common agency use: plans at any milestone, design technical reports, environmental documents and Caltrans deliverables, reviewed before your agency accepts or approves them.

Do you review CEQA and NEPA documents?

Yes. Nine environmental specialists screen EIRs, EISs, EAs and IS/MNDs and every technical study inside them before circulation. Environmental findings are decided by your authorized decision-maker, not by CivilRisk IQ.

Do you work on local projects, not just state highways?

Yes. City and county capital improvement projects such as pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter, sidewalks and ADA ramps, storm drains and signals use the same specialist team and method.

How long does a review take?

A typical review takes 5 to 10 business days, depending on the size of the package and the agreed scope.

How is our data handled?

Files are stored per project with authorized access only, and raw agency documents never train models silently. We help your IT and procurement teams with the security documentation they need before records are shared. Security & data.

How do we get started?

Start with a complimentary 20-minute consultation. From there we scope a review around your next submittal or decision. Agencies typically engage CivilRisk IQ through a purchase order or an on-call task order.

A conversation with the founder

What decision is your
agency facing next?

Complimentary 20-minute consultation with founder Jason Bennecke. No project files needed. Meet Jason →

Authorized access, project-scoped storage, and no silent training on your documents. Security & data →

Rivet, the CivilRisk IQ mascot, waving
A few short questions. About two minutes.