Assigned projects only
Each reviewer sees only the projects assigned to them, never another client's work.
The platform
One project record.
Every finding traceable.
Behind every CivilRisk IQ review is a platform built for engineering evidence: 21 discipline specialists, a manager and Red Team that cull weak claims, a portal where your reviewers decide, and reports generated from the same record.
Browser-based · Microsoft 365 sign-in · Reports in PDF, Word, CSV and JSON
By the numbers One real review: I-215 / Keller Interchange, 95% PS&E plans
281plan-set pages reviewed in one I-215 / Keller Interchange 95% PS&E run
1,212 → 474raw candidates narrowed to retained findings by manager and Red Team review
21AI specialists: 12 plan-set disciplines and 9 environmental resource areas
5–10business days for a typical review, depending on package size and scope
The review team
21 specialists, one per discipline.
Each specialist reads the whole package through one lens, the way a discipline reviewer would, and every candidate it raises cites its sheet or page.
Plan-set specialists 12
Design QA
Constructability
Hydraulics & Drainage
Traffic Operations
Drafting & CADD
Utilities & Right of Way
Cost & Quantity
Electrical, Signals & ITS
Schedule & Claims
Geotechnical
Structures
Red Team
Environmental specialists 9
Project Description & Alternatives
CEQA/NEPA Compliance
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Community & Transportation
Physical Environment
Air, Climate, Noise & Energy
Document QA
Environmental Red Team
From candidate to released finding
How a finding is made.
- 01
Specialists read every page
Discipline specialists review the full package in parallel and raise candidates with sheet and page references.
- 02
Manager merges and ranks
Duplicates from different specialists are merged and each candidate gets a likely severity and its reasoning.
- 03
Red Team challenges
A Red Team tests weak or unsupported claims. On the Keller plans, 1,212 candidates became 474 retained findings.
- 04
A person releases it
A licensed engineer (design) or an authorized decision-maker (environmental) decides what is released to your team.
The portal
Where your reviewers make the call.
Released findings go to a secure portal, so the people responsible for the design or the document can answer each one with the evidence in front of them.
The sheet beside the finding
Open the plan sheet or page a finding cites, with its location and evidence, without hunting through the set.
Confirm, Revise or Dismiss
Record a decision and a short note on every finding. Your engineers keep authority over the design.
Who decided, and when
Every decision is recorded with the reviewer and time, so the record can be traced later.
Report packages
Executive summaries, findings registers and detailed finding sheets compiled as PDF and Word downloads.
Microsoft 365 sign-in
Reviewers use their company accounts and MFA through Microsoft Entra ID. Nothing to install.
Screens from the platform
What your team actually works with.
Screens from the live portal and CRIQ review runs. Counts vary by run. Tap a screen to see it full size.
One record, different conversations
Choose the view that fits your role.
01
Engineering review
Source context, candidate concerns and documented reasoning for the people checking the work. The review process →
02
Project center
Released reports, findings and engagement documents in one place for the project team. Access and security →
03
Management reporting
Priorities, remaining questions and the decisions requested, for leaders and boards. Report formats →
Questions about the platform
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to install anything?
No. The portal runs in a web browser, and your reviewers sign in with their existing Microsoft 365 accounts. Security & data.
How large a package can CivilRisk IQ review?
Large ones. Real examples include a 281-page 95% PS&E plan set and a 1,032-page, eight-volume Administrative Draft EIR/EA, both for the I-215 / Keller Interchange.
Can it read scanned documents?
Yes. Scanned pages are read with OCR, so older plans and appendices can be included in the review.
What formats do the outputs come in?
Report packages in PDF and Word, PDF comment files for Bluebeam or Acrobat, and structured findings data in CSV and JSON. See all report formats.
Does the AI decide what is a defect?
No. Specialists raise candidates, a manager and Red Team cull them, and a licensed engineer or authorized decision-maker decides what is released. Your team decides what changes.
See it on your project
Bring a plan set or document.
We’ll show you what the platform finds.
Complimentary 20-minute consultation with founder Jason Bennecke. No project files needed. Meet Jason →
Authorized access, project-scoped storage, and no silent training on your documents. Security & data →
A few short questions. About two minutes.